[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Fortran 90/95 support (autoconf)

From: Akim Demaille
Subject: Re: Fortran 90/95 support (autoconf)
Date: 04 Jul 2001 16:57:26 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Academic Rigor)

| Hi AKim,


Please, keep it public.

| sorry for the long time since my last response; I just don't get stuff
| finished due to my heavy work load in 'real' life. I try to complete the
| patch along the line you suggested today or tomorrow and send it in
| again. Is that early enough? 

I no longer schedule this for 2.51, but 2.52.  2.51 should be released
RSN, I'm trying to get help at closing the remaining bugs, have a
round of heavy testing, and then ship it.  Say by the end of next

Then I'd like to work on 2.52 with three main targets:

- integrate autom4te
- integrate F 90/95
- integrate C 89 as a language, drop the AC_PROG_CC_STDC approach

So you have some time ahead.

And anyway, before applying your changes, I think we ought to split
aclang into aclang, aclang-c (C, C 89, C++), and aclang-fortran.  We
can debate about the names.

| BTW, I had sent the paper work several
| weeks ago and also got an response and some nice stickers from the GNU
| FSF; so it should be there somewhere.

Good :)

| Thanks for your understanding,

Thanks for your contributing!

|   Chris.
| On  4 Jul, Akim Demaille wrote:
| >>>>>> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <address@hidden> writes:
| > 
| > Akim> Still, we cannot accept your contribution until the FSF agrees,
| > Akim> which means filling a few papers from the `contributing' pages
| > Akim> on
| > 
| > Akim> Thanks a lot for your contribution!
| > 
| > I don't think I ever received any answer about your contribution.  Are
| > you still interested in seeing this in 2.52?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]