[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FYI: Stack traces
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: FYI: Stack traces |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Aug 2003 16:08:41 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
>>> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <address@hidden> writes:
Akim> There is one thing that remains not satisfying: an m4 script that
Akim> issues warnings and then an m4_fatal will not see the warnings, since
Akim> they are processed after a _successful_ run of m4.
> Why can't they be processed after a failed run? Is that just
> because the xsystem() is not the right interface for the job,
> or is it something else?
Maybe I misunderstood your suggestion: we could issue m4_fatal as a
regular warning, and just m4_exit afterwards. Then we just get the
flow of warnings, properly ending with the fatal message. Of course.
Thanks...
- FYI: Stack traces, Akim Demaille, 2003/08/22
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: FYI: Stack traces,
Akim Demaille <=