autoconf-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: FYI: Stack traces


From: Akim Demaille
Subject: Re: FYI: Stack traces
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 16:08:41 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)

>>> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <address@hidden> writes:
 Akim> There is one thing that remains not satisfying: an m4 script that
 Akim> issues warnings and then an m4_fatal will not see the warnings, since
 Akim> they are processed after a _successful_ run of m4.  

 > Why can't they be processed after a failed run?  Is that just
 > because the xsystem() is not the right interface for the job,
 > or is it something else?

Maybe I misunderstood your suggestion: we could issue m4_fatal as a
regular warning, and just m4_exit afterwards.  Then we just get the
flow of warnings, properly ending with the fatal message.  Of course.
Thanks...




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]