Re: Bugs encountered updating GCC

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 04:09:17PM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > I need to settle on a solution to use in GCC until an updated
> > autoconf is available.
> 
> Thanks.  Your change good to me, so I installed it.  I documented it a
> bit differently though.  Here's what I installed; this patch also
> handles an unrelated doc issue with test -L.

Thank you!

Anyway, I'm back (already...).  If you thought something was strange
about my explanation, well, it was.  This handles headers which
generate preprocessor warnings, but not headers which generate
_compiler_ warnings, which is the new way of checking for headers
anyway.

So I've only postponed the problem, not solved it.

I'm not quite sure what to do about it... a generic "strict" mode where
warnings from the compiler are also rejected?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer