[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Problem with cl and autoconf
From: |
Noah Misch |
Subject: |
Re: Problem with cl and autoconf |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:40:33 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6i |
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 11:14:46AM -0800, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Alexandre Duret-Lutz <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > I wonder if it wouldn't make sense to have
> > exec </dev/null
> > right in the initialization of configure.
>
> Now why didn't I think of that? Thanks; that simplifies the code as well.
> I installed this:
>
> 2005-02-11 Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
This will break net-snmp's `configure', which interacts with the user.
I am torn on whether that is a bad thing.
- Re: Problem with cl and autoconf, Paul Eggert, 2005/02/10
- Re: Problem with cl and autoconf, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2005/02/11
- Re: Problem with cl and autoconf, Paul Eggert, 2005/02/11
- Re: Problem with cl and autoconf,
Noah Misch <=
- Re: Problem with cl and autoconf, Paul Eggert, 2005/02/13
- Re: Problem with cl and autoconf, Andreas Buening, 2005/02/13
- Re: Problem with cl and autoconf, Paul Eggert, 2005/02/14
- Re: Problem with cl and autoconf, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2005/02/14
- Re: Problem with cl and autoconf, Paul Eggert, 2005/02/14
- Re: Problem with cl and autoconf, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2005/02/15
- Re: Problem with cl and autoconf, Paul Eggert, 2005/02/15
- Re: Problem with cl and autoconf, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2005/02/16
- Re: Problem with cl and autoconf, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2005/02/23
- Re: Problem with cl and autoconf, Paul Eggert, 2005/02/23