[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: g95 is not gfortran
From: |
Steven G. Johnson |
Subject: |
Re: g95 is not gfortran |
Date: |
Fri, 03 Jun 2005 19:57:15 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Macintosh/20041206) |
Juha Vierinen wrote:
There are two GNU fortran projects that use names g95 (g95.sf.net) and
gfortran. I am using g95 right now and it seems to be more ready that
gfortran. So any chance of including it in the list of compilers?
This seems like a good patch to me.
m4_define([_AC_F95_FC], [f95 fort xlf95 ifort ifc efc pgf95 lf95 g95 gfortran
ftn])
Since gfortran and g95 are now (sort of) released, and autoconf
generally prefers gcc to other compilers, it's probably best to put them
at the front of the list:
m4_define([_AC_F95_FC], [gfortran g95 f95 fort ........])
I've attached a patch which does this, updates the comments in the code,
and the ChangeLog entry is given below. Okay to commit?
2005-06-03 Steven G. Johnson <address@hidden>
* lib/autoconf/fortran.m4 (_AC_PROG_FC): Find g95 in addition
to gfortran, and make these the first two compiler names
checked (following the general autoconf preference for gcc).
diff.out
Description: Binary data
- Re: g95 is not gfortran,
Steven G. Johnson <=