autoconf-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: const/volatile vs. -Werror


From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: const/volatile vs. -Werror
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 14:55:47 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11

* Eric Blake wrote on Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 02:46:22PM CEST:
> 
> This patch allows:
> ./testsuite -d -k 'C keywords' CFLAGS='-Wall -Werror'
> to succeed with gcc 3.4.4.  There were so many tests in AC_C_CONST, some
> with duplicate names but different scopes, that I relettered the local
> variables.

Eric, please make my life easier and resubmit a *minimal* patch
that allows me to quickly see what's going on.  No renaming.

Let's put this in a bit stronger words: until the alpha release,
I will reject any non-minimal patch for new stuff, even bugfixes.
I don't have unlimited time, and I don't want this release to
take unlimited time, and after 2.60 there'll be enough time for
everyone to do cleanup patches and thus introduce new bugs.

Thanks,
Ralf

> 2006-04-07  Eric Blake  <address@hidden>
> 
>       * lib/autoconf/c.m4 (AC_C_CONST, AC_C_VOLATILE): Avoid warnings
>       from gcc.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]