[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Avoid certain spurious `testsuite' rebuilds
From: |
Noah Misch |
Subject: |
Re: Avoid certain spurious `testsuite' rebuilds |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Apr 2006 12:21:55 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6i |
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 11:40:33AM +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 11:43:11AM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> > While you're changing it, $(TESTSUITE) and $(TESTSUITE_GENERATED_AT) belong
> > in
> > MOSTLYCLEANFILES, not DISTCLEANFILES.
> 2) clean-local calls `./testsuite --clean' so you cannot put ./testsuite
> to CLEANFILES. You can add `rm -f ./testsuite' to clean-local, though.
> For the same reason `make mostlyclean' cannot remove it; a subsequent
> `make clean' wouldn't work then.
Good point. Keeping them in DISTCLEANFILES is not so bad, then.
> Moreover I made the change discussed elsewhere that mktests.sh should
> fail in the created *.at file happens to be empty.
As things stand, `acautoheader.at' and `acautoupdate.at' are empty. They have
been empty for a long time. Is this wrong?
- Re: Avoid certain spurious `testsuite' rebuilds, (continued)
- Re: Avoid certain spurious `testsuite' rebuilds, Stepan Kasal, 2006/04/10
- Re: Avoid certain spurious `testsuite' rebuilds, Noah Misch, 2006/04/10
- Re: Avoid certain spurious `testsuite' rebuilds, Stepan Kasal, 2006/04/10
- Re: Avoid certain spurious `testsuite' rebuilds, Paul Eggert, 2006/04/10
- Re: Avoid certain spurious `testsuite' rebuilds, Stepan Kasal, 2006/04/10
- Re: Avoid certain spurious `testsuite' rebuilds, Paul Eggert, 2006/04/10
- Re: Avoid certain spurious `testsuite' rebuilds,
Noah Misch <=