[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: const/volatile vs. -Werror
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: const/volatile vs. -Werror |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Apr 2006 18:02:06 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11 |
Hi Eric,
* Eric Blake wrote on Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 11:57:34PM CEST:
>
> This resubmittal is tested with
> ./testsuite -d -k 'C keywords' CFLAGS='-std=c89 -Wall -Werror'
> and fixes the C89 regression I made in the first version. I
> understand if you decide to delay this patch until after the alpha
> release, since it only helps the corner case of configuring with
> -Werror.
I think this is safe now, and have applied it.
Thanks!
Ralf
> 2006-04-07 Eric Blake <address@hidden>
>
> * lib/autoconf/c.m4 (AC_C_CONST, AC_C_VOLATILE): Avoid warnings
> from gcc.