autoconf-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: const/volatile vs. -Werror


From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: const/volatile vs. -Werror
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 18:02:06 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11

Hi Eric,

* Eric Blake wrote on Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 11:57:34PM CEST:
> 
> This resubmittal is tested with
> ./testsuite -d -k 'C keywords' CFLAGS='-std=c89 -Wall -Werror'
> and fixes the C89 regression I made in the first version.  I
> understand if you decide to delay this patch until after the alpha
> release, since it only helps the corner case of configuring with
> -Werror.

I think this is safe now, and have applied it.

Thanks!
Ralf

> 2006-04-07  Eric Blake  <address@hidden>
> 
>       * lib/autoconf/c.m4 (AC_C_CONST, AC_C_VOLATILE): Avoid warnings
>       from gcc.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]