autoconf-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: m4_combine


From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: m4_combine
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:34:30 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)

Hi Eric,

* Eric Blake wrote on Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 03:14:31PM CEST:
> 
> Based on libtool's lt_combine, but a bit more efficient.  Committed.

Nice!  But it would even be nicer if this (and other new interfaces)
showed up in the testsuite.  Typically[1], untested interfaces are
broken or rot, and I assume you have tested all the newly documented
ones?  (If you haven't, then of course I can try to write some, too,
but also I'd be starting to be scared by your low error ratio.  ;-)

Cheers,
Ralf

[1] One could even go as far as saying that untested interfaces are
broken by definition.  Experience confirms that.

> 2007-10-17  Eric Blake  <address@hidden>
> 
>       Add m4_combine, based on Libtool's lt_combine.
>       * lib/m4sugar/m4sugar.m4 (m4_combine): New macro.
>       * doc/autoconf.texi (Text processing Macros): Document it.
>       * NEWS: Likewise.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]