[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 12/12] use a shell function for AC_TYPE_INTx_T
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 12/12] use a shell function for AC_TYPE_INTx_T |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Oct 2008 13:43:01 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Paolo Bonzini <bonzini <at> gnu.org> writes:
> $ set abc def
> $ echo $2_
> def_
>
> Known nonportability or (understandable) paranoia?
I stand corrected. Too much paranoia on my part. POSIX is clear (only names
consume as many characters as possible; special parameters, like 2, are not
names, since they don't start with a letter), and I can't find any
counterexamples. OK to commit without those three changes, then, since I
obviously didn't test the scenario before writing that last email.
--
Eric Blake
- [PATCH 12/12] use a shell function for AC_TYPE_INTx_T, Paolo Bonzini, 2008/10/20
- [PATCH 12/12] use a shell function for AC_TYPE_INTx_T, Paolo Bonzini, 2008/10/27
- Re: [PATCH 12/12] use a shell function for AC_TYPE_INTx_T, Eric Blake, 2008/10/27
- Re: [PATCH 12/12] use a shell function for AC_TYPE_INTx_T, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/10/28
- Re: [PATCH 12/12] use a shell function for AC_TYPE_INTx_T, Paolo Bonzini, 2008/10/28
- Re: [PATCH 12/12] use a shell function for AC_TYPE_INTx_T, Eric Blake, 2008/10/28
- Re: [PATCH 12/12] use a shell function for AC_TYPE_INTx_T, Paolo Bonzini, 2008/10/28
- Re: [PATCH 12/12] use a shell function for AC_TYPE_INTx_T, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/10/28
- Re: [PATCH 12/12] use a shell function for AC_TYPE_INTx_T, Paolo Bonzini, 2008/10/28
- Re: [PATCH 12/12] use a shell function for AC_TYPE_INTx_T, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/10/28
- Re: [PATCH 12/12] use a shell function for AC_TYPE_INTx_T, Eric Blake, 2008/10/28
- Re: [PATCH 12/12] use a shell function for AC_TYPE_INTx_T, Eric Blake, 2008/10/28