Re: Faster AT_CHECK, one less XFAIL

[Eric Blake]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

According to Paolo Bonzini on 11/21/2008 3:49 AM:
> Eric Blake wrote:
>> Now that m4_expand is more robust, I switched AT_CHECK to start using it.
>>  I had to fix a bit of fallout - a grand total of two tests (one with
>> unbalanced '('
> 
> Should we warn about that?

Was this NEWS entry (part of that patch) good enough?

+** The m4sugar macro m4_expand has been taught to handle unterminated
+   comments and shell case statements.  As a result, it is used in
+   more places, such as AC_DEFINE and AT_CHECK.  Most uses should not
+   behave any differently; however, it may be necessary to add
+   double-quoting around unbalanced `(' where single-quoting used to
+   be sufficient.

- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!

Eric Blake             address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkkmsBgACgkQ84KuGfSFAYBqvACfZ9cfFsZ+HZjnD5LPXBFmN7I/
Nl8AoMuCPLrsbS3E98oZ/FS6nXP0NVG1
=5f6W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----