Re: Coverage and doc fixes for AC_LANG_SOURCE and AC_LANG_PROGRAM.

[Ralf Wildenhues]

* Eric Blake wrote on Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 03:31:08AM CEST:
> On 06/06/2010 05:56 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > Without the URL change, the results are documented wrongly in the
> > manual, missing
> >   #define PACKAGE_URL ""
> > 
> > so this might be nice before 2.66.  OK?
> 
> Given that argument, yes, this looks fine.

Thanks.

> > The second patch has the downside of requiring maintenance should the
> > formatting of the source contents change.
> 
> I only saw one patch?

I meant "the second test", not a second patch, sorry.  But you
understood me alright.

> But I'm okay with the slight maintenance burden
> if the file contents change slightly; at least with an automated test,
> we are more likely to notice it as it happens, and decide at that time
> if (and how) the test can be relaxed.

My thinking, too.

Cheers,
Ralf