[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 2/2] docs: mention ksh file descriptor limitation
From: |
Stefano Lattarini |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 2/2] docs: mention ksh file descriptor limitation |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:48:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.30-2-686; KDE/4.4.4; i686; ; ) |
Hi Eric.
At Friday 30 July 2010, Eric Blake wrote:
> * doc/autoconf.texi (File Descriptors): Document issue with fd 10
> and above.
> Reported by Ralf Wildenhues.
> ---
> ChangeLog | 5 +++++
> doc/autoconf.texi | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
> index 278a565..0ef1fd3 100644
> --- a/ChangeLog
> +++ b/ChangeLog
> @@ -1,5 +1,10 @@
> 2010-07-29 Eric Blake <address@hidden>
>
> + docs: mention ksh file descriptor limitation
> + * doc/autoconf.texi (File Descriptors): Document issue with fd 10
> + and above.
> + Reported by Ralf Wildenhues.
> +
> docs: mention cd limitation
> * doc/autoconf.texi (Limitations of Builtins) <cd>: Document
> issues with empty argument.
> diff --git a/doc/autoconf.texi b/doc/autoconf.texi
> index 493b9dc..7e804a7 100644
> --- a/doc/autoconf.texi
> +++ b/doc/autoconf.texi
> @@ -15041,6 +15041,20 @@ File Descriptors
> obsolete, so it's now safe to treat file descriptors 3 and 4 like
> any other file descriptors.
>
> +On the other hand, you can't portably use multi-digit file descriptors.
> +Solaris @command{ksh} doesn't understand any file descriptor larger
> +than @samp{9}:
> +
FWIW, Solaris /bin/sh and /usr/xpg4/bin/sh don't understand it, too.
Is this worth documenting?
Regards,
Stefano