[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: AC_PROG_LN_S limitation

From: Stefano Lattarini
Subject: Re: AC_PROG_LN_S limitation
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 10:02:35 +0100

HI Paul.

On 12/26/2011 11:27 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 12/26/11 13:21, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>>> * NEWS:
>> Forgotten a trailing "Update" here?  And ditto in the ChangeLog entry.
> The style I was using was:
>   * foo:
>   * bar (baz): log message
> where the log message applies to both lines.
Oh, OK.  I wasn't aware such a format was allowed by the GCS.

> I suppose one can write it this way:
>    * foo, bar (baz): log message
> but I prefer to use the latter form only
> when both FOO and BAR have a BAZ,
> which isn't the case here.
Honestly, I'd have written it like this:

 * foo: <log message>.
 * bar (baz): Likewise.

but this is just a cosmetic issue, so no big deal.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]