[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_OBJEXT again
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: AC_OBJEXT again |
Date: |
30 Nov 2000 16:16:29 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Channel Islands) |
>>>>> "Earnie" == Earnie Boyd <address@hidden> writes:
Earnie> HTH,
It does, thanks. But then, you are referring to EXEEXT as a *build*
feature, not a host feature.
Frankly, I think we will never end having problems until we introduce
the two sets. I can't see why EXEEXT and OBJEXT should be both
relevant for the build process, and for when the program is run on its
host.
- Re: AC_OBJEXT again, (continued)
- Re: AC_OBJEXT again, Lars J. Aas, 2000/11/29
- Re: AC_OBJEXT again, Akim Demaille, 2000/11/30
- Re: AC_OBJEXT again, Akim Demaille, 2000/11/30
- Re: AC_OBJEXT again, Akim Demaille, 2000/11/30
- Re: AC_OBJEXT again, Lars J. Aas, 2000/11/30
- Re: AC_OBJEXT again, Akim Demaille, 2000/11/30
- Re: AC_OBJEXT again, Lars J. Aas, 2000/11/30
- Re: AC_OBJEXT again, Akim Demaille, 2000/11/30
- Re: AC_OBJEXT again, Peter Eisentraut, 2000/11/30
Re: AC_OBJEXT again, Earnie Boyd, 2000/11/30
- Re: AC_OBJEXT again,
Akim Demaille <=
Re: AC_OBJEXT again, Earnie Boyd, 2000/11/30
RE: AC_OBJEXT again, Bernard Dautrevaux, 2000/11/30
Re: AC_OBJEXT again, Mo DeJong, 2000/11/30