[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gcc -nologo?
|
From: |
Tobias Hunger |
|
Subject: |
Re: gcc -nologo? |
|
Date: |
Tue, 3 Apr 2001 15:30:54 +0200 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 03 April 2001 13:03, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> In any case, it would only be used if `${CC-cc} -E' failed to
> preprocess a trivial file. Does config.log explain why it failed, and
> configure decided to fallback to -nologo -E?
There is no config.log. The nologo gets generated by autoconf. It is not in
configure.in, but in the configure-file created with autoconf. How can I see
what autoconf does to decide which flags and so on to use? As far as I know
the config.log gets created by configure, or am I wrong there?
- --
Gruss,
Tobias
- -------------------------------------------------------------------
Tobias Hunger The box said: 'Windows 95 or better'
address@hidden So I installed Linux.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE6ydCPVND+cGpk748RAiocAKCLZwJV/nV+H1XKcQazDiw3kCb5UQCfSATg
SAjxtRfpOl1k8xorC4F2GSY=
=ppkl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----