[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Merging AC_PROG_CC and AC_PROG_CPP (was: autoconf-2.49f/CPPFLAGS)
|
From: |
Akim Demaille |
|
Subject: |
Re: Merging AC_PROG_CC and AC_PROG_CPP (was: autoconf-2.49f/CPPFLAGS) |
|
Date: |
27 Apr 2001 15:01:43 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) |
>>>>> "Ralf" == Ralf Corsepius <address@hidden> writes:
>> I _know_ that CPPFLAGS is used both by AC_PROG_CPP and AC_PROG_CC,
>> so it seems natural to document it in both or find a means to
>> factor it for both.
Ralf> Wouldn't AC_REQUIRE-ing a macro containing AC_SUBST(CPPFLAGS)
Ralf> from AC_PROG_CC and AC_PROG_CPP remedy this issue?
Yep, that's a means to implement the factoring thing I was referring
to. Well, I guess we should remain in the safe side, and do this
indeed.
Nonetheless, I would really appreciate hearing pros/cons for keeping
things such as AC_PROG_CPP, AC_PROG_CXXCPP etc. instead of merging
them into AC_PROG_CC.