[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: autoconf-2.50 docs: Common Behavior/Default Includes
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: autoconf-2.50 docs: Common Behavior/Default Includes |
Date: |
Tue, 29 May 2001 02:55:56 -0700 (PDT) |
> From: Lars Hecking <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 10:33:14 +0100
>
> I'm unfamiliar with the C99 Standard, but did it adopt sys/types.h,
No.
> or define any relationship between sys/types.h and stdint.h/inttypes.h?
Only indirectly. E.g. POSIX says sys/types.h defines size_t, and C99
says size_t must be no wider than uintmax_t, which is defined by
stdint.h and by inttypes.h.
Also, while we're on the subject, POSIX 1003.1-200x draft 6 says that
there must be a compilation environment where size_t is no wider than
long, and the GNU coding standards say that it is safe to assume that
size_t is no wider than long. The only known potential porting target
that violates this assumption is Microsoft Windows on the 64-bit Intel
platform.
- autoconf-2.50 docs: Common Behavior/Default Includes, Lars Hecking, 2001/05/28
- Re: autoconf-2.50 docs: Common Behavior/Default Includes, Russ Allbery, 2001/05/28
- FYI: Including stdint.h (Was: autoconf-2.50 docs: Common Behavior/Default Includes), Akim Demaille, 2001/05/31
- Re: FYI: Including stdint.h (Was: autoconf-2.50 docs: Common Behavior/Default Includes), Alexandre Oliva, 2001/05/31
- Re: FYI: Including stdint.h (Was: autoconf-2.50 docs: Common Behavior/Default Includes), Paul Eggert, 2001/05/31
- Re: FYI: Including stdint.h (Was: autoconf-2.50 docs: Common Behavior/Default Includes), Akim Demaille, 2001/05/31