[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_PROG_YACC question
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: AC_PROG_YACC question |
Date: |
10 Oct 2001 15:50:12 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Artificial Intelligence) |
| > You'll need to call
| > AC_CHECK_PROGS(YACC, byacc yacc 'bison -y', [AM_MISSING_PROG(yacc)])
| > instead of using the undocumented, unsupported, internal am_missing_run
|
| That had worried me a little. Thanks for clarifying that.
It seems incorrect to me. AC_MISSING_PROG is a macro performing a
task (i.e., an instruction), while AC_CHECK_PROGS wants a value as $4
(i.e., an expression).
The point of missing is having the right thing happen even if the
program is missing, so don't bother looking for a Yacc, require Bison:
AM_MISSING_PROG([YACC], [bison -y])
- AC_PROG_YACC question, David Coquil, 2001/10/05
- Re: AC_PROG_YACC question, Bob Proulx, 2001/10/05
- Re: AC_PROG_YACC question, David Coquil, 2001/10/07
- Re: AC_PROG_YACC question, Bob Proulx, 2001/10/07
- Re: AC_PROG_YACC question, David Coquil, 2001/10/07
- Re: AC_PROG_YACC question, Bob Proulx, 2001/10/07
- Re: AC_PROG_YACC question, Tim Van Holder, 2001/10/08
- Re: AC_PROG_YACC question, David Coquil, 2001/10/08
- Re: AC_PROG_YACC question, Tim Van Holder, 2001/10/08
- Re: AC_PROG_YACC question, Bob Proulx, 2001/10/09
- Re: AC_PROG_YACC question,
Akim Demaille <=
- Re: AC_PROG_YACC question, Akim Demaille, 2001/10/10