[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
address@hidden news..
From: |
Guido Draheim |
Subject: |
address@hidden news.. |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Nov 2001 18:00:10 +0100 |
* autogen macros added
Bruce Korb's latest achievement in his autogen project resulted in some
fine macro pieces which I have added to an extra subcategorie in the
ac-archive sfnet-branch until it gets decided where to put them in the
gnu-branch. I did also add a crosslink to http://autogen.sf.net to draw
more attraction to his works. Let's see how that works...
* some macros updated
I had some rework of my own macros to update them to work properly in
the 2.5x generation - this is usually related to kill the m4-changequote
in there which the multilevel macroisms in the new generation do not
particularly like. I do also see that the bigendian_cross functionality
is integrated in the cvs-tree which is good to hear but brings up the
question what should be done with ac-macros being overrated by autoconf
itself. For now, I let them rust in peace ;-)
* acinclude tool
the growing popularity of the ac-archive has made some flaws to shine
out badly stemming from the aclocals-installoption present only in the
sfnet-branch. I tried to document the whys in an extra doc section on
the frontpage at http://ac-archive.sf.net - and which lead me to invent
a new tool called "acinclude" to help me solve the problems atleast for
the moment. Well, this is not new code actually but a variant of the
"aclocal" tool shipped for quite a time with the gnu autotools. Basically,
it will construct an "acinclude.m4" file from the macros living in the
ac-archive and other site-wide extension-directories from users or projects.
This tool might be a bit controverse, so don't hesitate to hit me hard
for any problems around this one ;-)
I had lately not much time to work on the sfnet-branch, so it still carries
the code-portions that were added to give the feel of the gnu-branch to
some extent. However neither me or Peter had time in the last months to
solve out the remaining problems and I noticed that more and more people
got to notice the sfnet-branch which was never actually announced as a proper
project - I just needed a working place to put up my package files which
were already under heavy usage, so I could not wait longer than a week or two
after the aclocals-extras were backed out in the gnu-branch cvs. The use of
packaging files and version numbers however seems to be regarded as useful,
so I will adapt the current packaging system later on to let it stand on its
own feet - until then, don't get nervous about the current pile of six rpms
of wondrous naming and functionality as I'll clean that up next time around.
regards, guido
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- address@hidden news..,
Guido Draheim <=