[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cache directory is not removed
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: cache directory is not removed |
Date: |
07 Jun 2002 07:55:34 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Honest Recruiter) |
>>>>> "Paul" == Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:
>> From: Sam Steingold <address@hidden> Date: 06 Jun 2002 11:26:02 -0400
>>
>> I could never understand why autoconf was written in m4 in the
>> first place. this is not a troll, I would really appreciate a
>> clarification.
Read the doc!
>> perl or, better yet, clisp (http://clisp.cons.org) appear to be
>> more reasonable choices for just about any task.
Paul> Well, partly it's because Autoconf was written before Perl or
Paul> clisp were stable enough.
Paul> But even if the choice were made now, it's not clear to me that
Paul> m4 would be a bad choice for Autoconf per se.
100% agreed. I would still chose M4.
Re: cache directory is not removed, Sam Steingold, 2002/06/06
RE: cache directory is not removed, Sam Liddicott, 2002/06/07
RE: cache directory is not removed, Sam Liddicott, 2002/06/10