[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Contents of <confdefs.h> for C++
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: Contents of <confdefs.h> for C++ |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Jul 2002 09:57:51 -0700 (PDT) |
> Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2002 10:40:17 -0500
> From: "Walter E. Brown" <address@hidden>
>
> Thanks, Paul, for the courteous and quick response.
>
> Suppose my program defines entities whose names clash with names
> declared in <stdlib.h>.
That's certainly reasonable, but we're not talking about your actual
program here. We're talking about what the little test program -- the
one that "configure" compiles. Surely this little test program can be
written so that it will still work as desired even if <stdlib.h> is
included.
> However, there may be compelling reasons for autoconf's current
> behavior
If you find them out, please let me know. Like I said, I don't use
C++, so I'm not the right guy to ask. It would be helpful if this
stuff were written down as comments in the source.
- Contents of <confdefs.h> for C++, Walter E. Brown, 2002/07/04
- Re: Contents of <confdefs.h> for C++, Paul Eggert, 2002/07/05
- Re: Contents of <confdefs.h> for C++, Walter E. Brown, 2002/07/05
- Re: Contents of <confdefs.h> for C++,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: Contents of <confdefs.h> for C++, Raja R Harinath, 2002/07/05
- Re: Contents of <confdefs.h> for C++, Walter E. Brown, 2002/07/05
- Re: Contents of <confdefs.h> for C++, Raja R Harinath, 2002/07/05
- Re: Contents of <confdefs.h> for C++, Walter E. Brown, 2002/07/08
- Re: Contents of <confdefs.h> for C++, Braden McDaniel, 2002/07/08
- Re: Contents of <confdefs.h> for C++, Walter E. Brown, 2002/07/09
- Re: Contents of <confdefs.h> for C++, Akim Demaille, 2002/07/10
- Re: Contents of <confdefs.h> for C++, Paul Eggert, 2002/07/08
- Re: Contents of <confdefs.h> for C++, Akim Demaille, 2002/07/09