[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Checking for CXX libraries -- AC_CXX_CHECK_LIB ?
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: Checking for CXX libraries -- AC_CXX_CHECK_LIB ? |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Sep 2002 23:20:33 -0700 (PDT) |
> From: Allan
> Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 21:01:05 -0400
>
> What I'm asking is: how's the best way to go about this? Stop the
> copying of AC_TRY_LINK_FUNC(C) to AC_TRY_LINK_FUNC(C++), and generate
> C++ -usable code with versatility in the function-call?
Yes. I think we need to rethink AC_TRY_LINK_FUNC entirely for C++.
The user needs to supply a sample call, not just the function name.
- Checking for CXX libraries -- AC_CXX_CHECK_LIB ?, Reply To List Only, 2002/09/28
- Re: Checking for CXX libraries -- AC_CXX_CHECK_LIB ?,
Paul Eggert <=
- Objections? Re: Checking for CXX libraries -- AC_CXX_CHECK_LIB ?, Allan Clark (reply to list only), 2002/09/29
- Re: Objections? Re: Checking for CXX libraries -- AC_CXX_CHECK_LIB ?, Steve M. Robbins, 2002/09/29
- Re: Objections? Re: Checking for CXX libraries -- AC_CXX_CHECK_LIB ?, Allan Clark (Reply To List Only), 2002/09/30
- Re: Objections? Re: Checking for CXX libraries -- AC_CXX_CHECK_LIB ?, Sebastian Huber, 2002/09/30
- Re: Objections? Re: Checking for CXX libraries -- AC_CXX_CHECK_LIB ?, Allan Clark (Reply to List Only), 2002/09/30
- Re: Objections? Re: Checking for CXX libraries -- AC_CXX_CHECK_LIB ?, Sebastian Huber, 2002/09/30
- Re: Objections? Re: Checking for CXX libraries -- AC_CXX_CHECK_LIB ?, Sebastian Huber, 2002/09/29
- Re: Objections? Re: Checking for CXX libraries -- AC_CXX_CHECK_LIB ?, Allan Clark (Reply To List Only), 2002/09/30