[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: system libraries that need -R/path/
From: |
Albert Chin |
Subject: |
Re: system libraries that need -R/path/ |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Nov 2003 10:06:34 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 03:09:57AM -0500, Harlan Stenn wrote:
> IMO the macros belong in autoconf, as autoconf is where folks are *using*
> the libraries and need the -R flag.
>
> I would not want to have to remember to update/install libtool someplace
> in order to get these macros. I don't want to tell folks who want to use
> the maintainer version of the NTP tree that they now also have to install
> libtool. NTP does not use libtool and I have no plans for it to do so.
>
> But wherever they end up, I'd prefer that they be integrated ASAP, as I want
> to use this for the next release of NTP.
The proposed macro will fail on Tru64 UNIX, AIX, and HP-UX. This is
due to the limits discussed at the end of Bruno's email. Do we want a
macro that fails on these systems?
--
albert chin (address@hidden)
- Re: system libraries that need -R/path/, (continued)
- Re: system libraries that need -R/path/, Bruno Haible, 2003/11/25
- Re: system libraries that need -R/path/, Harlan Stenn, 2003/11/25
- Re: system libraries that need -R/path/, Akim Demaille, 2003/11/26
- Re: system libraries that need -R/path/, Albert Chin, 2003/11/26
- Re: system libraries that need -R/path/, Akim Demaille, 2003/11/27
- Re: system libraries that need -R/path/, Gary V. Vaughan, 2003/11/27
- Re: system libraries that need -R/path/, Harlan Stenn, 2003/11/28
- Re: system libraries that need -R/path/, Gary V. Vaughan, 2003/11/28
- Re: system libraries that need -R/path/,
Albert Chin <=
Re: system libraries that need -R/path/, Bruno Haible, 2003/11/28
Re: system libraries that need -R/path/, Bruno Haible, 2003/11/30