|
From: | Peter O'Gorman |
Subject: | Re: Building all static |
Date: | Thu, 04 Nov 2004 00:08:34 +0900 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Macintosh/20040803) |
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
Considering Bob's posts about how static linking against system libraries gets you a binary that might stop working if you move it to another similar version, or upgrade your system... and considering that we already extract a list of automatically linked libraries for each compiler incase we want to link with ld: Why do you want to make -static the same as -all-static?
I am almost certain that in those cases the system libraries in question are not available as shared libs. I don't see -all-static doing anything at all on platforms where lt_prog_compiler_static is not set. I am saying that even without this flag libtool can and should look for static libraries in favor of shared ones if -static is on the command line.
Peter -- Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |