[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C99 support
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: C99 support |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Nov 2004 23:10:25 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i |
* Paul Eggert wrote on Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 10:56:29PM CET:
> Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Have you checked there is no compiler which will compile your test
> > program but not general C99 in its `C89 plus extensions' mode?
>
> The Autoconf Way is to first put the compiler into "C99 plus
> extensions" mode, and then to check how much of C99 (and how many
> extensions) you really get. It's OK if the compiler doesn't support
> all the C99 features, as long as it supports some of them, and so long
> as turning on "C99 plus extensions" mode doesn't break something
> important.
Good. That sounds much better.
Regards,
Ralf
- Re: C99 support, (continued)
- Re: C99 support, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/11/28
- Re: C99 support, Roger Leigh, 2004/11/29
- Re: C99 support, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/29
- Re: C99 support, Roger Leigh, 2004/11/29
- Re: C99 support, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/29
- Re: C99 support, Roger Leigh, 2004/11/29
- Re: C99 support, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/29
- Re: C99 support, Austin Schutz, 2004/11/29
- Re: C99 support, Ralf Wildenhues, 2004/11/30
- Re: C99 support, Paul Eggert, 2004/11/30
- Re: C99 support,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: C99 support, Ralf Wildenhues, 2004/11/30
- Re: C99 support, Paul Jarc, 2004/11/29
- Re: C99 support, Paul Eggert, 2004/11/30