autoconf
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: conditionally using libtool


From: Bob Rossi
Subject: Re: conditionally using libtool
Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 08:58:06 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i

On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 09:39:04PM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Mon, 1 May 2006, Bob Rossi wrote:
> >
> >Would you mind quicly explaining how autoconf works? Meaning what are
> >the steps taken that generate a configure.sh script?
> 
> Don't be needlessly confused by the m4 "gibberish" which is often 
> posted here.  It is not necessary to understand such "gibberish" in 
> order to properly use autoconf.
> 
> The 'aclocal' program is used to pull in any m4 macros defined in the 
> autoconf/automake/libtool system install directory, as well as any 
> project-specific macros from acinclude.m4, and put them in an 
> aclocal.m4 file.  The 'aclocal' program is smart and only pulls in the 
> macros that configure.ac actually needs.  When autoconf is executed, 
> it uses m4 to create a shell script ('configure') based on expanding 
> the macros from aclocal.m4 as they are encountered in configure.ac. 
> Recently it has become popular to include macros in additional .m4 
> files so that the macros may be bundled in the package without 
> cluttering up the project-specific acinclude.m4 file or to make it 
> more clear who maintains them.  These may be placed in the same 
> directory as configure.ac, or in a subdirectory, as long as autoconf 
> is told where to find them.

Thanks! This greatly improves my understanding. I actually have a very
little bit of experience working with m4, as I'm working with Akim to
get bison acting as a push parser.

> >I understand that m4 is used. Is m4 the only tool that is run on the
> >configure.in file to generate the configure script? I'm trying to better
> >understand how macro's in an sh condition effect the outcome.
> 
> Long ago I wrote a magazine article on Autoconf.  Remarkably most of 
> it is still correct, which shows that the GNU autoconf approach is 
> quite stable.  See "http://www.byte.com/art/9711/sec4/art2.htm";.

Thanks, I'll read this today.

Bob Rossi




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]