Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co

[Patrick Welche]

On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 10:55:45AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> According to Patrick Welche on 5/28/2007 10:45 AM:
> > (Also removes what appear to be spurious #(  )
> > 
> > -  case $ac_cv_c_int$1_t in #(
> > -  no|yes) ;; #(
> > +  case $ac_cv_c_int$1_t in
> > +  no|yes) ;;
> 
> Sorry, but that is not spurious.  It is a shell coding trick to make
> syntax highlighting detect balanced (), in spite of the unbalanced ) of
> portable case statements.

Fair enough! (serves me right for just using raw vi ;-) )
What do you think of the HAVE_ part?

Cheers,

Patrick