[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co
From: |
Patrick Welche |
Subject: |
Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co |
Date: |
Tue, 29 May 2007 13:48:45 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-03-22) |
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:31:04PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 04:54:52AM +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote:
> > I'm going to answer only one of your minor comments now.
>
> Thank you for the explanation of CHECK_FOO vs CHECK_FOOS! The documentation
> consistency change seems fine, and my configure.ac snippet becomes
>
> AC_INIT([autotype],[1.0])
> AC_CONFIG_HEADERS([config.h])
> AC_TYPE_UINT8_T
> AC_TYPE_SIZE_T
> AC_CHECK_TYPES([uint8_t, size_t])
> AC_OUTPUT
Actually, that isn't quite right either, is it? Do I really need
AC_CHECK_TYPES([uint8_t, size_t], [], [], [config.h])
as if a type didn't exist, and where typedef'd in config.h, how
would AC_CHECK_TYPES know about it?
Cheers,
Patrick
- Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, Patrick Welche, 2007/05/29
- Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, Paul Eggert, 2007/05/29
- Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, Stepan Kasal, 2007/05/30
- Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, Patrick Welche, 2007/05/30
- Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, Stepan Kasal, 2007/05/30
- Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, Paul Eggert, 2007/05/30
- Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, Stepan Kasal, 2007/05/30
- Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, Patrick Welche, 2007/05/30
- Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, Paul Eggert, 2007/05/30
- Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, Paul Eggert, 2007/05/31
- Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co,
Patrick Welche <=
Re: AC_TYPE_UINT8_T and co, Paul Eggert, 2007/05/29