[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete?
From: |
Stepan Kasal |
Subject: |
Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete? |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Jun 2008 09:49:43 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) |
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 10:40:02PM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> I recall having to deal with this issue on fairly recent systems in the
> 1996-98 timeframe so 'int' didn't just go away because ANSI C said so.
IIRC, the same was said on this thread earlier. It's about ten years
since this was last seen, so it can be marked obsolete and a few
years later deleted.
Stepan
- Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete?, (continued)
- Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete?, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/06/07
- Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete?, Eric Blake, 2008/06/09
- Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete?, Paul Eggert, 2008/06/09
- Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete?, Harlan Stenn, 2008/06/09
- Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete?, Eric Blake, 2008/06/09
- Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete?, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/06/09
- Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete?, Paul Eggert, 2008/06/10
- Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete?, Tim Post, 2008/06/10
- Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete?, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/06/10
- Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2008/06/11
- Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete?,
Stepan Kasal <=
- Re: AC_TYPE_SIGNAL obsolete?, Russ Allbery, 2008/06/10