[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_TRY_COMPILE() annoyances with 2.63b
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: AC_TRY_COMPILE() annoyances with 2.63b |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Apr 2009 07:50:28 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 07:38:10AM CEST:
>
> But that isn't what you need here. There are situations in which you
> cannot prove whether $1 is blank or not. In that case, we should add
> both the ":\n" as well as $1.
Actually, $1 can just expand to `#\n' (that is, comment sign plus
newline) and the shell will still report a syntax error. If you
want to disallow the user shooting himself in the foot, then `:\n'
or `:;' is probably needed.
Cheers,
Ralf
- AC_TRY_COMPILE() annoyances with 2.63b, Mike Frysinger, 2009/04/05
- Re: AC_TRY_COMPILE() annoyances with 2.63b, Eric Blake, 2009/04/05
- Re: AC_TRY_COMPILE() annoyances with 2.63b, Mike Frysinger, 2009/04/05
- Re: AC_TRY_COMPILE() annoyances with 2.63b, Mike Frysinger, 2009/04/05
- Re: AC_TRY_COMPILE() annoyances with 2.63b, Eric Blake, 2009/04/06
- Re: AC_TRY_COMPILE() annoyances with 2.63b, Mike Frysinger, 2009/04/06
- Re: AC_TRY_COMPILE() annoyances with 2.63b, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/04/06
- Re: AC_TRY_COMPILE() annoyances with 2.63b, Mike Frysinger, 2009/04/06
- Re: AC_TRY_COMPILE() annoyances with 2.63b, Eric Blake, 2009/04/06
- Re: AC_TRY_COMPILE() annoyances with 2.63b, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/04/07
- Re: AC_TRY_COMPILE() annoyances with 2.63b,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: AC_TRY_COMPILE() annoyances with 2.63b, Mike Frysinger, 2009/04/07
- Re: AC_TRY_COMPILE() annoyances with 2.63b, Andreas Schwab, 2009/04/07
- AS_IF optimization (was: AC_TRY_COMPILE() annoyances with 2.63b), Eric Blake, 2009/04/07
- Re: AS_IF optimization (was: AC_TRY_COMPILE() annoyances with 2.63b), Andreas Schwab, 2009/04/07
- Re: AS_IF optimization, Eric Blake, 2009/04/07
- Re: AS_IF optimization, Eric Blake, 2009/04/10
- Re: AC_TRY_COMPILE() annoyances with 2.63b, Eric Blake, 2009/04/10