[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_SUBST and AC_CACHE_VAL
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: AC_SUBST and AC_CACHE_VAL |
Date: |
Wed, 13 May 2009 22:57:38 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
Hi Stefan,
* Stefan Bienert wrote on Wed, May 13, 2009 at 10:52:02PM CEST:
> > Old habit. Use AS_CASE, please. It makes a difference only if its
> > arguments expand AC_REQUIRE statements.
>
> As I thought. I always use AS_CASE/ AS_IF, makes live a little bit more
> lazy...where is AS_FOR ;-)?
Wating for you to implement it. ;-)
> >> Isn't SB_FOOS empty if not initialised?
>
> > Sure, but do you want it to be seedable or not?
>
> What does "seedable" mean?
Accepting an initial value by the user from the command line or the
environment, as I wrote earlier. Sorry for the being terse.
Cheers,
Ralf
- AC_SUBST and AC_CACHE_VAL, Stefan Bienert, 2009/05/12
- Re: AC_SUBST and AC_CACHE_VAL, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/05/13
- Re: AC_SUBST and AC_CACHE_VAL, Stefan Bienert, 2009/05/13
- Re: AC_SUBST and AC_CACHE_VAL, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/05/13
- Re: AC_SUBST and AC_CACHE_VAL, Stefan Bienert, 2009/05/13
- Re: AC_SUBST and AC_CACHE_VAL,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: AC_SUBST and AC_CACHE_VAL, Stefan Bienert, 2009/05/13
- Re: AC_SUBST and AC_CACHE_VAL, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/05/14
- Message not available
- Re: AC_SUBST and AC_CACHE_VAL, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/05/15
- Re: AC_SUBST and AC_CACHE_VAL, Eric Blake, 2009/05/13