[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: improve INSTALL contents
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: improve INSTALL contents |
Date: |
Sun, 17 May 2009 21:50:52 -0400 |
I believe his point is that this thread seems disproportionately
long (and cross-posted too widely) for the small potential benefit,
if ever something comes of it.
Ralf doesn't need to read, or even respond to the thread if that is
the case.
I like the blurb Eric suggested,
Most packages support installation into a staging directory
(e.g. for packaging or testing purposes), by setting the
DESTDIR variable, as in @samp{make address@hidden install}.
- Re: improve INSTALL contents, (continued)
- Re: improve INSTALL contents, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/05/17
- Re: improve INSTALL contents, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/05/17
- Re: improve INSTALL contents, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/05/17
- Re: improve INSTALL contents, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/05/17
- Re: improve INSTALL contents, Jim Meyering, 2009/05/17
- Re: improve INSTALL contents, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/05/17
- Re: improve INSTALL contents, Keith Marshall, 2009/05/20
- Re: improve INSTALL contents, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/05/21
- Re: improve INSTALL contents,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: improve INSTALL contents, Douglas Held, 2009/05/17
Re: improve INSTALL contents (was: Core-utils 7.2; building only 'su'), Keith Marshall, 2009/05/15