autoconf
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 'set +o' or '. /dev/fd/0' or?...


From: Eric Blake
Subject: Re: 'set +o' or '. /dev/fd/0' or?...
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 05:26:56 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.22) Gecko/20090605 Thunderbird/2.0.0.22 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

According to Alfred M. Szmidt on 7/13/2009 5:06 AM:
>       { set +o; COMMAND; } | sh

Required by POSIX, but some older shells don't handle it well.  Solaris
/bin/sh appears to just ignore it.  Older ash gives output that cannot be
reparsed as valid commands.

>       COMMAND | . /dev/fd/0

Depends on the file system providing it.  But named fifos might be more
widely supported; does this look any better?

mkfifo fifo
(COMMAND >fifo)&
. fifo
rm fifo

> Can't you use? COMMAND | sh +x

No, that always sets +x in the child shell, even when it was not set in
the parent.

Or, one other idea:

{ echo "set -$-"; COMMAND; } | sh

- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!

Eric Blake             address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkpbGf8ACgkQ84KuGfSFAYDvhwCcC7ax2HnE1GjcXRADBREe45jI
2gkAnjG4JmP79aAOxJMCQNuJcDW1IBya
=mHxP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]