[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AT_CHECK within for loop
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: AT_CHECK within for loop |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Jan 2011 10:52:06 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-08-04) |
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 08:37:26PM CET:
> * Joel E. Denny wrote on Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 08:31:05PM CET:
> > tmp.at:4: error: AT_CHECK: missing AT_SETUP detected
>
> Ah, I think it doesn't work to expand AT_CHECK inside a function.
Wrong again: I think it currently doesn't work to use AT_CHECK outside
or AT_SETUP/AT_CLEANUP pairs.
Sorry for the noise. The rest should still hold.
> Sorry for overlooking that requirement of yours.
>
> It might be possible to rework _AT_CHECK so that it will work in
> such a setup, should mostly be a matter of assigning some values
> that are currently held in m4 macros only to shell variables in
> AT_SETUP, and then referencing them in _AT_CHECK. This would
> probably enlarge testsuite code a bit, but maybe negligible.
- AT_CHECK within for loop, Daily, Jeff A, 2011/01/28
- Re: AT_CHECK within for loop, Eric Blake, 2011/01/28
- Re: AT_CHECK within for loop, Joel E. Denny, 2011/01/28
- Re: AT_CHECK within for loop, Eric Blake, 2011/01/28
- Re: AT_CHECK within for loop, Joel E. Denny, 2011/01/28
- Re: AT_CHECK within for loop, Ralf Wildenhues, 2011/01/28
- Re: AT_CHECK within for loop, Joel E. Denny, 2011/01/28
- Re: AT_CHECK within for loop, Ralf Wildenhues, 2011/01/28
- Re: AT_CHECK within for loop,
Ralf Wildenhues <=