[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
sharedlocalstate default - does anybody use this?
From: |
Mariano, Adrian V. |
Subject: |
sharedlocalstate default - does anybody use this? |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Jun 2018 12:09:08 +0000 |
It has been brought to my attention that in my package (GNU units) I have a
file that gets changed every day located in datarootdir---but this location is
for read only files.
The correct place for my architecture independent dynamic file would appear to
be sharedstatedir. However, this resolves to the rather bizarre path
/usr/local/com. I can't find any reference to anybody actually using this
path. Do all the distributions over-ride this into something "normal"? The
fedora units guy tells me it will be /var/lib, for example---and I think with
redhat the whole /usr directory is supposed to be read only.
So what's the correct practice for my package? Should I use sharedstatedir and
not worry about it resolving to a strange default path because mostly it will
get changed by site defaults? Or is there some other way to handle this?
- sharedlocalstate default - does anybody use this?,
Mariano, Adrian V. <=