Re: Making Autoconf 2.70 happen in the near future

[NightStrike]

On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 5:08 PM Zack Weinberg <address@hidden> wrote:

> I didn't get any suggestions of additional autoconf-using software
> packages to test.  To my mind, that is the biggest remaining hole in
> the plan.  Please suggest any software you know of whose autoconf
> usage is particularly complicated or fragile and I'll add it to my
> list of things to test.

GCC/Binutils/GDB, and the whole "cygnus" tree.