[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71)
From: |
Sam James |
Subject: |
Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71) |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Nov 2022 15:26:20 +0000 |
> On 16 Nov 2022, at 09:06, Frederic Berat <fberat@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hello again,
>
> Some progress on this, it looks like, at least for libpng, there is at one
> place where the "Port AC_LANG_CALL" seems to be the culprit.
> Specifically, the "," in the C comment, is interpreted by M4 as argument
> split which in turn leads to the syntax error.
> I made a small test where I "overquote" the snippet, which seems to work
> around the problem for this package at least, but there may be better
> solutions:
I did notice this issue but when I investigated the broken packages,
they were underquoting by the looks of it:
-
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/sys-devel/autoconf?id=855f1f72f42c2f9b5ed97220e3ced97a35aa075b
- https://bugs.gentoo.org/871753
But it's very possible that, as you note, autoconf itself
has a problem and it was just bad luck wrt which packages
broke first.
Best,
sam
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
- Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Frederic Berat, 2022/11/16
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Frederic Berat, 2022/11/16
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Frederic Berat, 2022/11/16
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71),
Sam James <=
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Arsen Arsenović, 2022/11/16
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Zack Weinberg, 2022/11/16
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Frederic Berat, 2022/11/17
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Zack Weinberg, 2022/11/17
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Zack Weinberg, 2022/11/17
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Frederic Berat, 2022/11/18
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Sam James, 2022/11/18
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Frederic Berat, 2022/11/19
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Frederic Berat, 2022/11/24