[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71)
From: |
Zack Weinberg |
Subject: |
Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71) |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Nov 2022 13:40:38 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Cyrus-JMAP/3.7.0-alpha0-1115-g8b801eadce-fm-20221102.001-g8b801ead |
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022, at 4:06 AM, Frederic Berat wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> Some progress on this, it looks like, at least for libpng, there is at one
> place where the "Port AC_LANG_CALL" seems to be the culprit.
> Specifically, the "," in the C comment, is interpreted by M4 as argument
> split which in turn leads to the syntax error.
> I made a small test where I "overquote" the snippet, which seems to work
> around the problem for this package at least, but there may be better
> solutions:
...
> m4_define([AC_LANG_CALL(C)],
> [AC_LANG_PROGRAM([$1
> m4_if([$2], [main], ,
> -[/* Override any GCC internal prototype to avoid an error.
> +[[/* Override any GCC internal prototype to avoid an error.
...
Double quotation of the arguments to AC_LANG_PROGRAM is the documented way to
avoid this kind of problem, see
https://www.gnu.org/savannah-checkouts/gnu/autoconf/manual/autoconf-2.71/html_node/Quotation-Rule-Of-Thumb.html
Since the code here is doing something more complicated than just passing
literal code fragments to AC_LANG_PROGRAM, I will need to dig into exactly what
it's doing before applying your patch or something like it (and I won't have
time to do that until the weekend) but you're on the right track.
(Anyone wanna write up some improvements to the documentation of
AC_LANG_PROGRAM itself? The need for double quotation is mentioned in one
sentence near the top of
https://www.gnu.org/savannah-checkouts/gnu/autoconf/manual/autoconf-2.71/html_node/Generating-Sources.html
but it's easy to miss.)
zw
- Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Frederic Berat, 2022/11/16
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Frederic Berat, 2022/11/16
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Frederic Berat, 2022/11/16
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Sam James, 2022/11/16
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Arsen Arsenović, 2022/11/16
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71),
Zack Weinberg <=
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Frederic Berat, 2022/11/17
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Zack Weinberg, 2022/11/17
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Zack Weinberg, 2022/11/17
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Frederic Berat, 2022/11/18
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Sam James, 2022/11/18
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Frederic Berat, 2022/11/19
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Frederic Berat, 2022/11/24
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Paul Eggert, 2022/11/17
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Frederic Berat, 2022/11/18
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Frederic Berat, 2022/11/18