[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71)
From: |
Frederic Berat |
Subject: |
Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71) |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Nov 2022 08:11:21 +0100 |
Thanks, I'll update the bug I opened for them.
On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 6:54 PM Zack Weinberg <zack@owlfolio.org> wrote:
> On 2022-11-17 9:30 AM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> > Or even better, get rid of the AC_EGREP_CPP at the same time
> >
> > AC_CACHE_CHECK([whether we need to define $1], ac_var,
> > [AC_PREPROC_IFELSE([[#ifndef $1
> > #error not defined
> > #endif]],
> > [AS_VAR_SET(ac_var,yes)],[AS_VAR_SET(ac_var,no)])])
>
> Correction, this should have been
>
> AC_CACHE_CHECK([whether we need to define $1], ac_var,
> [AC_PREPROC_IFELSE([[#ifndef $1
> #error not defined
> #endif]],
> [AS_VAR_SET(ac_var,no)],
> [AS_VAR_SET(ac_var,yes)])])
>
> Converting it to AC_PREPROC_IFELSE inverts the sense of the "then" and
> "else" clauses.
>
> zw
>
>
- Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Frederic Berat, 2022/11/16
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Frederic Berat, 2022/11/16
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Frederic Berat, 2022/11/16
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Sam James, 2022/11/16
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Arsen Arsenović, 2022/11/16
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Zack Weinberg, 2022/11/16
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Frederic Berat, 2022/11/17
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Zack Weinberg, 2022/11/17
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Zack Weinberg, 2022/11/17
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71),
Frederic Berat <=
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Sam James, 2022/11/18
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Frederic Berat, 2022/11/19
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Frederic Berat, 2022/11/24
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Paul Eggert, 2022/11/17
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Frederic Berat, 2022/11/18
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Frederic Berat, 2022/11/18
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Nick Bowler, 2022/11/18
Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Paul Eggert, 2022/11/17