[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71)
From: |
Bob Friesenhahn |
Subject: |
Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71) |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Nov 2022 14:34:26 -0600 (CST) |
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.20 (GSO 67 2015-01-07) |
On Thu, 17 Nov 2022, Paul Eggert wrote:
Thanks for reporting that. I installed the attached patch to work around the
bug in libpng. Of course this is just a hack, but there's some benefit to it
and no harm that I can see.
Could you please report the issue to the libpng maintainers? The attached
second patch should work around the immediate issue for them. I am not
plugged into the libpng ecosystem and don't know how to send them bug
reports. Thanks.
I have forwarded this to Cosmin Truta, the current libpng maintainer.
It may be useful to open a formal bug in the libpng bug tracker
(presumably at Github) in case he is busy.
Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
Public Key, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/public-key.txt
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), (continued)
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Frederic Berat, 2022/11/17
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Zack Weinberg, 2022/11/17
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Zack Weinberg, 2022/11/17
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Frederic Berat, 2022/11/18
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Sam James, 2022/11/18
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Paul Eggert, 2022/11/17
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Frederic Berat, 2022/11/18
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Frederic Berat, 2022/11/18
- Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Nick Bowler, 2022/11/18
Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Paul Eggert, 2022/11/17
Re: Possible regressions with trunk autoconf (vs 2.71), Sam James, 2022/11/16