[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 1.8 TODO
From: |
Alexandre Duret-Lutz |
Subject: |
Re: 1.8 TODO |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Jun 2003 00:23:08 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
>>> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <address@hidden> writes:
Akim> What is the current requirement wrt Libtool? Can I consider that any
Akim> Libtool that does not support configure.ac is ruled out?
Are you talking about the test suite here? I didn't understand you
wanted to update the test suite too (but that's good news).
How about this: if a test case uses `required=libtoolize', use
configure.in, otherwise use configure.ac. After all, Automake should
work with either file, so it is good if the test suite uses both.
I think it's better if we can avoid requiring some version of
Libtool. At least it doesn't seem worth the hassle here (from
the user's point of view).
--
Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- Re: 02-distclean-test.diff, (continued)
- Re: 02-distclean-test.diff, Derek Robert Price, 2003/06/24
- Re: 02-distclean-test.diff, Derek Robert Price, 2003/06/24
- 1.8 TODO (Was: Re: 02-distclean-test.diff), Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/06/26
- Re: 1.8 TODO, Akim Demaille, 2003/06/27
- Re: 1.8 TODO, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/06/27
- Re: 1.8 TODO, Akim Demaille, 2003/06/27
- Re: 1.8 TODO,
Alexandre Duret-Lutz <=
- Re: 02-distclean-test.diff, Derek Robert Price, 2003/06/25
- Re: 02-distclean-test.diff, Derek Robert Price, 2003/06/26
- Re: 02-distclean-test.diff, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/06/26
- Re: 02-distclean-test.diff, Derek Robert Price, 2003/06/26
- Re: 02-distclean-test.diff, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/06/27
- Re: 02-distclean-test.diff, Jim Meyering, 2003/06/27
- sorting NEWS (Was: Re: 02-distclean-test.diff), Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/06/27