|
| From: | Akim Demaille |
| Subject: | Re: proposed patch: parallel-tests: per-extension test driver: ext_COMPILE. |
| Date: | Sat, 14 Mar 2009 13:52:33 +0100 |
Le 14 mars 09 à 12:08, Ralf Wildenhues a écrit :
Corollary: the test driver may not be called CXXCOMPILE. General: For extension `.ext', we cannot use `EXTCOMPILE' as driver. ext_COMPILE or extCOMPILE seem awkward to me too, as these do not allow for generalization either, and the notational difference would be unintuitive (or even dangerous, think of preprocessed Fortran with .F extension). What else comes to mind? EXTTESTCOMPILE EXT_TESTCOMPILE EXT_TEST_COMPILE EXTLOGCOMPILE EXT_LOGCOMPILE EXT_LOG_COMPILE
I vote for the last one. Maybe COMPILER instead of COMPILE, and have the COMPILER + FLAGS go into COMPILE.
Maybe we should depart from COMPILE/COMPILER bw. I like it, but it might be misleading. Maybe CONVERT/TRANSLATE or something more general that COMPILE? Or FROM_EXT_TO_LOG. Not so nice :(
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |