automake-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] Improvements and extend tests on canonicalization.


From: Stefano Lattarini
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improvements and extend tests on canonicalization.
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 21:52:20 +0100
User-agent: KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.30-2-686; KDE/4.4.4; i686; ; )

On Monday 13 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 06:41:46PM CET:
> > Ping on this? Reference:
> >  <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2010-09/msg00106.html>
> > 
> > The updated patch is attached.  I will push it in 72 hours (by tuesday
> > evening) unless there are objections.
> 
> OK but ...
> 
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tests/canon8.test
> > @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
> 
> > +grep foob.rquux Makefile.in # might be useful for debugging
> > +grep address@hidden Makefile.in # `@' must not be transliterated ...
> > +grep 'address@hidden' Makefile.in && Exit 1 # ... ever!
> 
> ... these last two lines look scary: unbalanced backticks and
> exclamation mark in commands.  I know that that they are not special in
> comments, but the latter are special on the command line, and I don't
> like surprises when cut and pasting commands from a script.
>
Those comments aren't really that useful anyway; I squashed in the
following diff:

-*-*-*-

diff --git a/tests/canon8.test b/tests/canon8.test
index 0bd3bf8..2ae47dd 100755
--- a/tests/canon8.test
+++ b/tests/canon8.test
@@ -32,8 +32,9 @@ END
 $ACLOCAL
 $AUTOMAKE
 
-grep foob.rquux Makefile.in # might be useful for debugging
-grep address@hidden Makefile.in # `@' must not be transliterated ...
-grep 'address@hidden' Makefile.in && Exit 1 # ... ever!
+# The first grep is here mostly for debugging.
+grep foob.rquux Makefile.in
+grep address@hidden Makefile.in
+grep 'address@hidden' Makefile.in && Exit 1
 
 :

-*-*-*-

Will push by tomorrow if you don't object.

> Please avoid such inline comments, also because they hurt the
> eye, IMVHO.
>
Weird, I often find them visually appealing.  Taste is a strange
beast, isn't it? ;-)

Thanks,
  Stefano



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]