[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[RFC] Cleaning up automake branches
From: |
Stefano Lattarini |
Subject: |
[RFC] Cleaning up automake branches |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Dec 2011 10:58:47 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111114 Icedove/3.1.16 |
Hello automakers.
A look at:
<http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/automake.git/refs/heads>
shows that it's probably time to tie up some loose ends there, by removing
redundant branches, and turning old and unactive ones into tags.
Here is my proposals:
* I suggest to turn the branches `master-UNNAMED-BRANCH-UNNAMED-BRANCH'
and `master-UNNAMED-BRANCH' into tags, whose names are to be given
by the strings returned by `git-describe'.
* The branch `branch-real-1-5' points to an ancestor commit (grandfather
commit, more specifically) of `branch-1-5', so we can just remove it.
* The branches `branch-1-x' (for x = 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9) are all old and
inactive, the last commit in all of them being the security fix related
to CVE-2009-4029; I propose to turn them all into proper tags; any
suggestion for which the best names for such tags would be?
* The branch `user-dep-gen-merge-branch' is an quite-near ancestor of
`user-dep-gen-branch', and long long inactive (~ 13 years), so I
propose to remove it.
* The branch `user-dep-gen-branch' is untouched by ~12 years; I propose
to transform it into a tag (suggested name: `old-user-dep-gen').
* The branch `je-silent', implementing silent-rules support in automake,
has been since long merged into maint, and the features it provided
have clearly become part of the automake core. So I think we can
safely delete it.
Opinions, objections?
Regards,
Stefano
- [RFC] Cleaning up automake branches,
Stefano Lattarini <=