automake-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [FYI] {master} cosmetics: be more consistent in copyright notices in


From: Dave Hart
Subject: Re: [FYI] {master} cosmetics: be more consistent in copyright notices in tests
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 21:24:50 +0000

On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 12:57, Stefano Lattarini
<address@hidden> wrote:
> diff --git a/lib/Automake/tests/Condition.pl b/lib/Automake/tests/Condition.pl
> index e330e53..cf7d110 100644
> --- a/lib/Automake/tests/Condition.pl
> +++ b/lib/Automake/tests/Condition.pl
> @@ -1,13 +1,11 @@
> -# Copyright (C) 2001, 2002, 2003, 2009  Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> +# Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

Was the omission of the earlier copyright years intentional?  The
others had 2011 added to the years list, not replacing it.

> diff --git a/tests/cond39.test b/tests/cond39.test
> index f6a916e..52f95de 100755
> --- a/tests/cond39.test
> +++ b/tests/cond39.test
> @@ -1,21 +1,18 @@
>  #!/bin/sh
>  # Copyright (C) 2008, 2010, 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>  #
> -# This file is part of GNU Automake.
> -#
> -# GNU Automake is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>  # it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
>  # the Free Software Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option)
>  # any later version.
>  #
> -# GNU Automake is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> +# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>  # but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>  # MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
>  # GNU General Public License for more details.
>  #
>  # You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> -# along with Automake; see the file COPYING.  If not, write to
> -# the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor,
> +# along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
>  # Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA.

The way this diff reads, it appears the # Boston ... line above should
have been removed along with the rest of the FSF postal address.  The
same is true for several other files in this patch, which I haven't
enumerated because I assume automation is being used to generate these
patches and will be used to correct this issue.

Cheers,
Dave Hart



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]