[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug#13524: Improving user experience for non-recursive builds
From: |
Peter Rosin |
Subject: |
Re: bug#13524: Improving user experience for non-recursive builds |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Feb 2013 10:11:24 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 |
On 2013-02-08 09:45, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>> Fine as well. And of curse, if you want to speed thing up and have more
>> control on the final result, feel free to shepherd the pending patches to
>> the agreed form ;-) -- which if I'm not mistaken is:
>>
>> - make the series consist of only two patches, one introducing the
>> feature (complete with documentation and NEWS additions, plus your
>> original test case), and one follow-up patch implementing my
>> testsuite enhancement;
>>
>> - use the '%...%' form, and prefer lower-case for long names (so,
>> '%reldir%' a.k.a. '%D%' and '%canon-reldir%' a.k.a. '%C%').
>
> Done. I didn't address the canonicalization concern raised by Miles. That
> seems like a bigger issue than this patch series. However, If that naming
> is changing, it must be done before this series lands in a released
> version, or we'll end up with bad comptibility hacks...
Errm, compatibility...
Forgot to ask, but should I push out this non-fast-forward to the
experimental/preproc branch?
That would be 'git checkout experimental/preproc' followed by
'git push -f origin', right? I did rewrite that branch locally
assuming the old branch was destined for the bin, but I have
never actually done such a rewind of upstream before...
Cheers,
Peter
- Re: bug#13524: Improving user experience for non-recursive builds, (continued)
- Re: bug#13524: Improving user experience for non-recursive builds, Miles Bader, 2013/02/04
- Re: bug#13524: Improving user experience for non-recursive builds, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/02/07
- Re: bug#13524: Improving user experience for non-recursive builds, Miles Bader, 2013/02/07
- Re: bug#13524: Improving user experience for non-recursive builds, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/02/07
- Re: bug#13524: Improving user experience for non-recursive builds, Miles Bader, 2013/02/07
- Re: bug#13524: Improving user experience for non-recursive builds, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/02/08
- Re: bug#13524: Improving user experience for non-recursive builds, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/02/07
- bug#13524: Improving user experience for non-recursive builds, Peter Rosin, 2013/02/08
- [PATCH 1/2] preproc: add support for relative names in included fragments, Peter Rosin, 2013/02/08
- [PATCH 2/2] preproc: enhance and extend tests, Peter Rosin, 2013/02/08
- Re: bug#13524: Improving user experience for non-recursive builds,
Peter Rosin <=
- Re: bug#13524: Improving user experience for non-recursive builds, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/02/08
- [PATCH 0/2] Improving user experience for non-recursive builds, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/02/14
- [PATCH 1/2] preproc: add support for relative names in included fragments, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/02/14
- Re: bug#13524: [PATCH 1/2] preproc: add support for relative names in included fragments, Bert Wesarg, 2013/02/14
- Re: bug#13524: [PATCH 1/2] preproc: add support for relative names in included fragments, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/02/14
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] preproc: add support for relative names in included fragments, Bob Friesenhahn, 2013/02/14
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] preproc: add support for relative names in included fragments, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/02/14
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] preproc: add support for relative names in included fragments, Bob Friesenhahn, 2013/02/14
- Re: bug#13524: [PATCH 1/2] preproc: add support for relative names in included fragments, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/02/14
- [PATCH 2/2] preproc: enhance and extend tests, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/02/14