Re: ##-xxx-xxx.patch

automake

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ##-xxx-xxx.patch

From:	Allan Clark
Subject:	Re: ##-xxx-xxx.patch
Date:	Wed, 21 Feb 2001 13:39:31 -0800

Akim, everyone;

Is there I way I can simply get the discussion, without the binary/patch
traffic?  I would prefer to receive this kind of thing through an update
from a source-control (ie CVS) than copies from email.

Should I sign up on a different list?  Should address@hidden
be formed?

Allan

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

52-factored-install.patch, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/21
- Re: ##-xxx-xxx.patch, Allan Clark <=
  - Re: ##-xxx-xxx.patch, Pavel Roskin, 2001/02/21
    - Re: ##-xxx-xxx.patch, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/21
- Re: 52-factored-install.patch, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/21
  - Re: 52-factored-install.patch, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/23
    - Re: 52-factored-install.patch, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/23
    - Re: 52-factored-install.patch, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/23
    - Re: 52-factored-install.patch, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/26
- Re: 52-factored-install.patch, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/21
  - Re: 52-factored-install.patch, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/23
    - Re: 52-factored-install.patch, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/24

Prev by Date: Re: .PHONY targets are not needed?
Next by Date: Re: ##-xxx-xxx.patch
Previous by thread: 52-factored-install.patch
Next by thread: Re: ##-xxx-xxx.patch
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread