[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 52-factored-install.patch
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: 52-factored-install.patch |
Date: |
25 Feb 2001 11:55:52 -0700 |
>>>>> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <address@hidden> writes:
Akim> . &transform_cond ('BASE' => $strip_subdir,
Akim> 'EXEC' => $X =~ /exec/)
This is still wrong.
User-defined directory names follow the `exec'-name test.
autoconf/automake-defined directory names do not.
For instance, `foo_DATA', `data_DATA', and `pkgdata_DATA' must be
installed by install-data.
`fooexec_SCRIPTS' and `bin_PROGRAMS' must be installed by install-exec.
I think the latter case fails the new test.
Akim> I also provide a new test case.
This test is necessary but not sufficient.
Please add some more cases like those above...
Tom
- Re: 52-factored-install.patch, (continued)
- Re: 52-factored-install.patch, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/21
- Re: 52-factored-install.patch, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/23
- Re: 52-factored-install.patch, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/24
- Re: 52-factored-install.patch, akim, 2001/02/24
- Re: 52-factored-install.patch, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/25
- Re: 52-factored-install.patch,
Tom Tromey <=
- Re: 52-factored-install.patch, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/25
- Re: 52-factored-install.patch, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/25
- Re: 52-factored-install.patch, akim, 2001/02/25
- Re: 52-factored-install.patch, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/25
- Re: 52-factored-install.patch, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/26
- Re: 52-factored-install.patch, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/26
- Re: 52-factored-install.patch, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/26
- Re: 52-factored-install.patch, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/26
- Re: 52-factored-install.patch, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/26
- Re: 52-factored-install.patch, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/26