automake
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 10-all-redirect.patch


From: Akim Demaille
Subject: Re: 10-all-redirect.patch
Date: 06 Mar 2001 19:35:39 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley)

Tom Tromey <address@hidden> writes:

> >>>>> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> Akim> FYI, here is the result on the fileutils:
> 
> Akim> @@ -307,8 +307,8 @@
> Akim>                END { for (i in files) print i; }'`; \
> Akim>         test -z "$(ETAGS_ARGS)config.h.in$$unique$(LISP)$$tags" \
> Akim>           || etags $(ETAGS_ARGS) $$tags config.h.in $$unique $(LISP)
> Akim> -all: all-redirect
> Akim> -
> Akim> +all: config.h
> Akim> +       $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) all-recursive
> 
> I'm concerned by this.
> `all' should be the first target in Makefile.in.  But this makes it
> look like it comes after TAGS.
> Why?

Because it's an output from makesort, not from diff per se, and
makesort just sorts alphabetically.  The `+all' is affected just like
`-all' was, but in the actual output the order is fine.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]